Press Room

Press Clipping / Jun 22, 2020

One molecule’s journey from discovery to market

C&EN, June 22, 2020

With the help of outsourcing partners, the small biotech firm Nabriva brought lefamulin to patients by itself. Now it needs to make a profit in the tough-to-crack antibiotic business.

 

In November 2006, Rosemarie Riedl synthesized an antibacterial molecule that she logged into Nabriva Therapeutics' database as BC-3781. It was not just another entry in a compound collection. In 2019, after almost 13 years of development and testing, the US Food and Drug Administration approved that same molecule, lefamulin, for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Marketed as Xenleta, lefamulin was the first antibiotic with a novel mechanism of action to win FDA approval for pneumonia in nearly two decades. With the help of contract manufacturing firms from across Europe and China, Nabriva took the drug to market without a big pharma partner.

Inventing a drug in its own labs and getting it approved solo is something few biotech firms have done. And yet it won't be enough for the small company. Nabriva must now turn a profit on lefamulin, a goal that has eluded many independent antibiotic developers. Judging from Nabriva's stock price, investors have their doubts that the firm will be in the black anytime soon.

 

DISCOVERY

Although Nabriva's corporate offices are in the US, and its global headquarters are in Ireland, its research efforts are based in Vienna, where the culture is decidedly more European than American. Riedl, Nabriva's senior director of medicinal chemistry, has been with the company and its predecessor, Sandoz, since earning her PhD in pharmaceutical chemistry. And she's not the only long-tenured employee.

"The core team has been together for a long, long time," says Werner Heilmayer, Nabriva's vice president for intellectual property and chemistry, manufacturing, and controls. Like Riedl, Heilmayer has been there from the start. He joined Sandoz in 1995 after graduate school and went with Nabriva when it became an independent company in 2006.

That was the year that Novartis, Sandoz's parent company, decided it was done researching and developing new antibiotics, a field that has long been a money pit for big pharma. With about $50 million in financing from venture capital firms and its own venture arm, Novartis set the antibiotic operation off on its own.

As an independent company, Nabriva continued Sandoz's quest for useful derivatives of pleuromutilin, an antibiotic molecule that occurs naturally in an edible mushroom sometimes called Pleurotus mutilus.

Pleuromutilin was discovered in the 1950s, and Sandoz launched two semisynthetic derivatives, tiamulin and valnemulin, as veterinary antibiotics in 1979 and 1999, respectively. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) later succeeded in creating a topical human drug, but systemic human pleuromutilins with a wider potential market eluded drug hunters for decades.

One reason for the lack of success was that, for many years, researchers were focused on finding new beta-lactam antibiotics like amoxicillin and cephalosporin, still the most widely used antibiotic class. Drug company interest in pleuromutilins finally perked up around the turn of the century as bacterial resistance to beta lactams increased, according to a review paper that Riedl and a colleague, Susanne Paukner, published in 2017 in Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine.

According to the paper, pleuromutilins work by binding to the peptidyl transferase center on the bacterial ribosome, interfering with protein production and impeding growth. It's a unique mode of action for an antibiotic, even among those that work by blocking bacterial growth. Both mechanistic studies and in vitro experiments show a low potential for resistance to develop.

While pleuromutilin can kill bacteria in the lab, it doesn't have what it takes to make a good drug. Chemists needed to tweak the molecule to improve properties like how long it lingers in the bloodstream.

A year after Novartis spun off Nabriva, the FDA approved the first human pleuromutilin derivative, GSK's retapamulin. But the skin infection treatment, created by modifying the hydroxyacetyl side chain of pleuromutilin with a bicyclic N-methylpiperidine group, only works as an ointment; GSK was unable to put it into a pill or IV bag.

XENLETA AT A GLANCE
Discovered: 2006
Approved: Aug. 19, 2019
Active ingredient: Lefamulin
Indication: Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia
Mode of action: Binds to the peptidyl transferase center on the bacterial ribosome, interfering with protein production and impeding growth

Although Nabriva wasn't first to the market, the company was determined to come up with a systemic drug. When it became independent, the firm didn't have a viable drug candidate of its own. What it did have was a deep knowledge of pleuromutilin chemistry and well-honed skills for making derivatives.

The Nabriva researchers drew on those insights when they, like the chemists at GSK, sought to modify the hydroxyacetyl side chain. Their goal was a modification that would give the natural product the elusive balance of antimicrobial activity, solubility, and metabolic stability needed to turn a molecule into a systemic drug.

Unlike their counterparts at GSK, Riedl and her colleagues didn't have huge compound libraries and combinatorial chemistry machinery at their disposal. Instead, they relied on old-fashioned medicinal chemistry savvy. "We always did dedicated chemistry and synthetic derivatives, compound by compound," Heilmayer says.

In 2006, Riedl tried yet another modification of the side chain: adding an aminohydroxycyclohexyl group. The result was BC-3781, later renamed lefamulin. Riedl's choice of that side chain involved a bit of luck, of course, but mostly it was the culmination of years of carefully directed effort. She describes the moment modestly: "I always had a good feeling about that idea and that it could solve many of the problems we had at the time."

 

DEVELOPMENT

What Riedl actually got was a mixture of diastereomers that had to be separated on a chiral high-performance liquid chromatography column. And even after separation, BC-3781 did not instill a lot of confidence. It was a difficult-to-handle amorphous salt. And the laboratory synthesis required two classical chromatographic purifications. "You cannot have these things on scale," Heilmayer points out.

The Vienna team needed to develop a chirally selective synthesis that avoided chromatography, and a crystalline late-stage intermediate that could be isolated and purified. The team also had to come up with an acceptable salt form. "These were some of the problems we had to solve after discovering lefamulin," Heilmayer says.

The team solved them, and by 2014, lefamulin had successfully completed Phase I and II clinical trials showing it was safe as well as effective in a small group of bacterial pneumonia patients.

Because the Vienna facility didn't operate under the good manufacturing practice standards required by the FDA, Heilmayer had hired the chemistry outsourcing firms Aptuit and Almac to produce the small quantities of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) needed for those trials.

But Phase III clinical trials and, ultimately, commercialization would be a whole new ball game. New people, new outsourcing partners, and new money would be needed. The company hired a drug industry veteran as CEO and established a US subsidiary in Philadelphia where its clinical development team would be based. The following year Nabriva made an initial public offering of stock on the Nasdaq exchange.

One of the new executives was Steven Gelone, who is now Nabriva's president and chief operating officer, responsible for business development and technical operations. Gelone was a good fit. Earlier in his career as an infectious disease clinician at GSK, he and his colleagues were stymied by Sandoz's robust intellectual property (IP) around pleuromutilin derivatives.

"We kept hitting roadblocks," he recalls. "We just could not solve the problem, in large part because the Sandoz/Novartis team, which ultimately became Nabriva, had an IP portfolio that blocked us from doing some interesting chemistry on one of the key side chains." When Nabriva later offered Gelone a job, he couldn't say no.

Working with the Nabriva executives in the US, Heilmayer looked to secure firms that could manufacture the quantities needed under quality systems that would satisfy inspectors with the FDA and the European Medicines Agency. "Our desire was, as best we could as a small biopharma company, to create a gold standard supply chain for this product," Gelone says.

The critical synthetic step in lefamulin production is combining pleuromutilin with the aminohydroxycyclohexyl side chain. Heilmayer and his team needed to find large-scale suppliers of pleuromutilin and a chiral building block for the side chain, and a company to join the two pieces into the API. It also needed firms to produce the tablet and intravenous forms of the drug.

For pleuromutilin, Nabriva executives thought they had it easy. Sandoz had pioneered the fermentation of pleuromutilin to produce the two animal antibiotics, and the firm was Nabriva's supplier during clinical development of lefamulin. But in 2014, Eli Lilly and Company acquired the Sandoz/Novartis animal health business. Suddenly, Nabriva was told to look elsewhere for pleuromutilin supply.

Heilmayer had to scramble to find a new company that could supply pleuromutilin at the required purity and with quality systems that would satisfy regulators. He soon settled on the Chinese firm SEL Biochem Xinjiang.

SEL is the world's largest producer of pleuromutilin, using it mainly for its own production of the animal antibiotic tiamulin, according to Grace Xu, a vice president at Zhejiang University Sunny Technology, which owns SEL. For Nabriva, SEL developed a special high-purity version using higher quality standards, Xu says.

For the side chain building block, a cyclohexene carboxylic acid, Nabriva first contracted with an Indian pharmaceutical chemical company, which made it for Nabriva's clinical trials. But because the intermediate is a liquid acid, it had to be shipped from India via sea, rather than air, creating an unacceptably weak link in the supply chain, Heilmayer says. So, with approval and commercialization of lefamulin looking more and more likely, Nabriva sought an intermediate supplier closer to home.

It ended up choosing the Irish firm Arran Chemical, which Almac acquired in 2015. Arran had the right capabilities and equipment, and Heilmayer was impressed that it was able to quote a price for the intermediate lower than what Nabriva paid the Indian firm.

Companies in Ireland have higher labor costs than do those in India, acknowledges Tom Moody, Almac's vice president of technology development and commercialization. To offset them, Arran drew on other strengths. "In Ireland we have to do things efficiently," he says.

Almac, which is based over the border in Northern Ireland, acquired Arran during this period, mainly for its biocatalysis and API building block scale-up skills. Almac had worked with the Irish firm for more than a decade and wanted to bring those capabilities in-house, Moody says. The chiral building block contract with Nabriva was an intriguing sweetener, he adds, because Almac had produced the API in the early days of lefamulin development and formulated it into tablets for administering to patients during clinical trials.

To put the intermediates together into the final lefamulin molecule, Heilmayer and his team settled on the pharmaceutical services firm Hovione at its site in Cork, Ireland, just a 3 hour drive from the site in Athlone, Ireland, where Arran makes the side chain.

In choosing Hovione, Nabriva weighed the usual factors of quality, technical fit, timing, and price. But underlying the individual considerations was the knowledge that, unlike a big drug company, Nabriva couldn't afford to hire a second supplier in case things went wrong. "Whoever we chose," Gelone says, "we had to be highly confident in, because we knew we weren't going to have a second supplier when we launched lefamulin."

Hovione, a Portuguese firm, had acquired the Cork facility from Pfizer in 2009. At the time, the plant made only one API-atorvastatin, the active ingredient in Pfizer's cholesterol-lowering drug Lipitor. But by 2014, when Hovione and Nabriva started discussions, Hovione had succeeded in bringing new products to Cork, including several APIs, recalls Paul Downing, general manager of the site. Staffing at the facility had doubled since the acquisition to about 100.

By the time Nabriva and Hovione signed a contract in 2016, it was clear that lefamulin, now in Phase III studies, would need to be made on an accelerated schedule. Hovione typically developed synthetic methods for pharmaceutical chemicals at its pilot plant in Portugal and then produced initial quantities there before transferring the process to the commercial-scale reactors in Cork. "The timeline Nabriva required meant we had to skip the middle piece," Downing says.

Both parties knew that Hovione's job was more than just connecting two molecules. The cyclohexene carboxylic acid from Arran had to be taken through further chemical steps to form the aminohydroxycyclohexyl side chain that Riedl had conceived in 2006. And the hydroxyacetyl group on pleuromutilin has to be activated through an exchange of sulfur for oxygen to form a sulfanylacetyl linker that couples with the side chain.

"It seems simple, but it's actually a very long process that requires care and attention," says Rui Loureiro, Hovione's director of process chemistry development and the lead chemist on the development project. From start to finish, a production campaign takes about two months.

One area that called for special attention was phase separation. In lab tests of the reaction in Portugal, process chemists were surprised to find that three phases resulted, rather than the usual two. "We had to understand how you make sure in the plant that you take out the right phase of three phases," Loureiro says.

Another challenge was crystallizing and recrystallizing a molecule with multiple chiral centers. "That's how to ensure that you get the right isomers out of your reaction," Loureiro says.

The API that Hovione manufactures in Cork is the heart of Xenleta, but for people to take it, the white powder has to be turned into tablet and IV forms. For the tablet, Heilmayer turned to Almac again.

Nabriva had first hired Almac in the early 2010s to produce the lefamulin API for Phase I and II clinical trials. At the time, says Tommy Burns, an Almac project services manager, Nabriva took the logical next step in a good relationship and asked Almac's finished drug division to formulate the API into tablets.

Some years later, with clinical successes under its belt, Nabriva came back to Almac looking for tablet manufacturing and packaging for Phase III trials and commercial launch. "Nabriva needed a firm that could help overcome some of the development challenges they faced with the tablet," Burns says.

To be effective, lefamulin needs to be administered in high doses, and 600 mg is tough to squeeze into even a large tablet. Moreover, because the API is sticky, Almac was not able to create a traditional pill with the necessary on-dose product identifier embossed on the surface. Instead, Burns says, Nabriva and Almac worked together to develop a nonstandard pill for which the name is applied with an inkjet printer.

For vials of the drug for intravenous delivery, Nabriva contracted with Patheon's sterile liquid production facility in Monza, Italy. It also tapped Fresenius Kabi's sterile liquid contract manufacturing facility in Halden, Norway, to produce special companion IV bags to which the sterile drug is added.

As Gelone explains, Nabriva scientists realized early in the development of lefamulin that its pH in solution is important and should be maintained. They worked with Fresenius on a bespoke IV bag which they created by adding a citrate buffer to the conventional saline bags made in Halden. When a health-care professional pours a vial of Xenleta into the bag, the resulting solution is close to physiologic pH, Gelone says.

In the end, producing and distributing Xenleta requires a supply chain that stretches from China to multiple sites in Europe and, ultimately, the US. Nabriva took the risk of assembling it without knowing if regulators would actually clear the drug, but the bet paid off. The FDA approved Xenleta on Aug. 19, 2019.

"We had the product in the channel and ready for patients 16 days after approval," Gelone says.

 

MARKETING

Nabriva's manufacturing partners continue to refine their processes. At Hovione, for example, Loureiro is eager to develop continuous solvent extraction to decrease the amount of solvent required to recover the API. By his calculation, lefamulin generates 3% less waste than the typical API, but he says Hovione can cut waste further. "We believe there is space to improve the process."

And Burns says Almac is in the process of moving the granulation process for Xenleta tablets from pilot to commercial scale. Once the switch is complete, Almac's capacity to manufacture the pills will be markedly higher.

But even as Nabriva's partners streamline production, healthy demand for Xenleta is far from a sure thing.

In the past few years several biotech firms have won FDA approval of new antibiotics that are effective against resistant bacteria, only to find physicians and hospitals reluctant to prescribe them. In 2019 alone, three small antibiotic firms-Melinta Therapeutics, Aradigm, and Achaogen-all declared bankruptcy.

Public health experts say doctors and hospitals need new medicines to fight antibiotic-resistant infections, yet the companies that invent them too often find few customers.

"One of the conundrums that's very unique for anti-infectives is the strong desire to have innovation available but not wanting to use that innovation for fear you're going to ruin it by creating resistance," Gelone says. The health-care community thus thoroughly reviews the differentiating characteristics of a new antibiotic to understand the patients for which it is best suited. "I've run the committees that do it, and the process takes time," he says.

Nabriva contends that Xenleta falls in the right place. Pleuromutilin antibiotics, the firm says, have a lower propensity for resistance than most established antibiotics because they bind to bacterial ribosomes in a unique way and via multiple interactions. And lefamulin has the advantage of being approved in both IV and oral forms, meaning it has the potential to be administered first in a hospital and later at home.

New antibiotics aren't going to be billion-dollar-a-year drugs, Gelone acknowledges. "There has to be a perceived unmet medical need that the physician community believes this product will address," he says. "That's where lefamulin fits in."

Nabriva is finding the process of fitting in to be slow. In April, the company announced that it is laying off its hospital-oriented salesforce of 66 people, more than a third of its overall staff. Nabriva described the decision as part of a new strategy of focusing on community health-care professionals. Restrictions on interacting with hospital personnel during the coronavirus pandemic also played a role in the layoffs.

On May 11, Nabriva reported that it had product sales in the first quarter of 2020 of only $156,000. The firm also disclosed that it was in danger of being delisted from the Nasdaq stock market because its shares were trading for less than $1.00. In early 2017 they were changing hands for more than $12.50.

Still, Gelone is optimistic. European regulators just handed down a positive opinion, and Nabriva is working with its partner in China, Sinovant, on approval there. He notes that Xenleta could play a role in treating people infected with the novel coronavirus who also have contracted pneumonia.

In Vienna, Heilmayer and Riedl remain proud of what Nabriva has accomplished. Heilmayer wonders if a larger company would have stuck with the compound through the tougher moments. "They establish certain thresholds, and if you don't achieve these thresholds, the compound is gone," Heilmayer says of big drug firms. "In the biotech world, if you have a challenge you will always look for ways to overcome it."

Today, Heilmayer and Riedl are tackling new challenges. Heilmayer continues to work with Nabriva's outsourcing partners to support and troubleshoot Xenleta manufacturing. In one recent program, they elucidated and synthesized a new impurity encountered during large-scale API manufacturing.

As for Riedl, she and her colleagues are working on next-generation pleuromutilin antibiotics as well as other projects that she is keeping close to the vest. "Stay tuned for the next molecules from Nabriva," she says.

 

Read the article at C&EN

 

Also in the Press Room

See All

The global inhalation contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) market is projected to grow from USD 9.13 billion in 2025 to USD 16.68 billion by 2035, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.7% during the forecast period. This growth is driven by the increasing prevalence of respiratory diseases, advancements in inhalation drug delivery technologies, and the rising demand for outsourced manufacturing services in the pharmaceutical industry. The inhalation CDMO market has emerged as a pivotal segment in the pharmaceutical contract development and manufacturing industry. With a rising demand for inhaled therapies for conditions like asthma, COPD, and cystic fibrosis, companies are increasingly outsourcing drug development and production to specialized partners. Inhalation CDMO services cater to both large pharmaceutical corporations and small biotech firms, offering expertise in formulation, device compatibility, regulatory support, and scale-up manufacturing. This market is gaining traction due to the complexity of inhalation drug delivery, which often requires niche technical capabilities and specialized equipment. Outsourcing to an inhalation CDMO allows drug developers to reduce time-to-market while ensuring quality and compliance with global standards. (...) Top Companies Several players dominate the inhalation CDMO market through technological expertise, global reach, and service portfolio diversity: (...) Hovione – Offers particle engineering and inhalation development, with a focus on dry powder inhalers. (...) These companies are continually investing in facilities, talent, and technology to meet evolving customer needs in the inhalation CDMO market.   Read the full article on Pharmiweb.com        

Press Clipping

Inhalation CDMO Market Growth Analysis & Forecast 2025 to 2035

Jun 25, 2025

Pharmaceutical innovators face many challenges when developing new products; as such, getting them to market in a timely, safe and cost-effective way is critical. The use of continuous manufacturing technologies can help to overcome some of the most pressing early-stage obstacles Improving production methods for generic drugs or extending the lifecycle of existing oral solid dosage (OSD) forms is an integral part of the day-to-day operations of many global pharmaceutical companies. At the same time, when formulating new molecular entities, issues such as reducing the cost-per-tablet, increasing patient safety and optimising the price/performance balance of a new drug are common daily concerns. During the early stages of research and development (R&D), however, the availability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is limited. As such, there is an absolute requirement for process equipment that can produce just a few hundred grams of finished product to fast-track novel formulations.  The changing perspectives of regulatory bodies such as the US FDA and EMA now mean that there’s a better way to improve both supply chain efficiency and product throughput. It’s the 21st century, the pharmaceutical industry is less risk-averse these days, and it’s well-known that continuous manufacturing (CM) solutions can accelerate product development, reduce costs, improve operational economics and make production more agile. CM can accelerate the development of innovative products and increase the quality assurance of existing ones by driving process excellence. It’s a more efficient and flexible technology, offering more consistent and reliable tablet production with the reduced use (and loss) of resources such as precious APIs and raw materials. Additional benefits include less downtime and minimal manual intervention.   Introducing ConsiGma® The ConsiGma® portfolio from GEA Pharma & Healthcare is a multipurpose platform that has been designed to transfer powder into coated tablets in development, pilot, clinical and production volumes in a single compact unit. The system can perform the dosing and mixing of raw materials, wet or dry granulation, drying, tableting and quality control, all in one line. And, as it can produce granules continuously, there is no waste during start-up and shutdown and the batch size is determined simply by how long you run the machine. Quality is measured throughout the process and, as such, drastically reduces the cost-per-tablet. The ConsiGma® concept combines Quality by Design (QbD) principles with Design of Experiments (DoE) to explore and optimise a wide range of process parameters with less product in a shorter time frame.  Dr James (Jim) Holman, Senior Director of Technology Management, Pharma Solids, at GEA, takes up the story: “Our stance with CM is consistent in terms of how we approach both commercial-scale and early development work. We’ve created a range of unit operations or submodules, for example, that are ideal for process or product optimisation studies. For wet granulation, for instance, we have the ConsiGma®-1. You can use the same granulator that you would for a larger-scale machine but simply connect it to a single cell of a six-cell fluid bed system.” He adds: “Our approach to R&D is that we try to scale-out rather than scale-up. Our equipment is specifically designed so that you can process a plug or product key in a very controlled way to limit material usage.”  Jim can cite a litany of Big Pharma organisations that have “developed molecules on our systems in R&D, subsequently transferred them to production and have now had them approved for sale and use.” He acknowledges that, compared with a traditional production-scale system, there are advantages and disadvantages to consider. But he emphasises: “To support our thinking and what we’ve done, there are a lot of commercial products on the market that were made using GEA CM systems.”   The ConsiGma®-1: an integrated R&D solution Developed as a mobile, plug-and-play laboratory-scale version of the GEA’s continuous tableting platform, the ConsiGma®-1 can convert powders into dry granules and is ideal for small-scale research and development applications. It’s specifically designed for maximum flexibility and simplicity in early formulation development work. And, because of its rapid processing times and ability to run batches of a few hundred grams up to 5 kg or more, it’s ideal for developing formula and process parameters using DoE — which can then be scaled-out to the full-size ConsiGma® wet granulation system. “With ConsiGma®, we can help companies all over the world to maximise their R&D efforts and capitalise on the very worthwhile expenditure by getting first-rate products to market quicker,” notes Jim. When equipped with the optional fluid bed dryer segment, drying parameters for batch sizes of 500–1500 g can be determined on the ConsiGma®-1. And, because these granulation details can be directly scaled-out to a production model (such as the ConsiGma®-25), which benefits from the same design, there is no scale-up.  Furthermore, as the retention time of the product in the system is minimal, any change in these parameters is almost immediately visible. This allows for very fast and easy exploration of the design space. The result is a better understanding of both operational capabilities and critical process parameters (CPPs), which ultimately contribute to higher levels of quality assurance and patient safety.  The ConsiGma®-1 is designed for rapid deployment, will fit into the most compact of laboratories and can be transported easily to wherever it’s needed. Installation only requires electricity and standard utilities such as water and compressed air. The system is conceived to be a “plug-and-play” installation. To enhance the R&D flexibility even further, the ConsiGma®-1 can also be configured for hot melt granulation and/or upgraded for contained processing. To cite an example, a ConsiGma®-1 unit was recently used to expedite the development process for a new product during in-house trials. Everything was running smoothly during scale-out to a commercial-size line, until one of the raw material sources had to be changed. Anticipating granulation issues due to the changed specifications of the raw material, and with a pending deadline — and not wishing to revert to the ConsiGma®-1 for redevelopment (or to clean another piece of equipment) — it was decided to tackle the issue using the production-scale CM line. Owing to the inherent flexibility of continuous processing and the transferable compatibility of the critical parameters, the correct settings were found in just a few hours using only a limited amount of product. Full production mode could be quickly reinstated with minimal disruption. The ConsiGma® DC for continuous direct compression is the most recent expansion of GEA's portfolio of cost-effective, compact and high-yield manufacturing systems. By integrating four key technologies — accurate loss-in-weight feeding, continuous blending, tablet compression technology and the online measurement of CQAs (Critical Quality Attributes), it offers a robust and flexible production method for a wide range of products in a small footprint. Of note here is that standalone plant is often used to separately test and optimise the critical unit operations before the entire line is constructed, thereby accelerating the process. This means that each manufacturing step can be enhanced without first having to run or invest in a complete process chain. One company that has benefited from this approach is Hovione, a specialist contract development and manufacturing organisation. Using a combination of standalone laboratory scale units coupled with process analytical technology (PAT) tools, computational models and powder characterisation equipment, Hovione is developing processes at the R&D scale with minimal material consumption and resources. The standalone dosing and blending unit is equipped with feeders and blenders that are identical to those used in GEA’s GMP Continuous Direct Compression (CDC) lines. Powder characterisation and the use of compaction simulations “close the circle” in terms of connecting the unit operations and allow operators to fully define the process parameters that are used in a digital twin version of the line. João Henriques, R&D Director – Oral Drug Product Development comments: “This integrated platform accelerates process development, helps to optimise formulation and product parameters and improves operational performance. It also enables the seamless scale-out of continuous tableting processes to a GMP line with reduced risk and low API consumption. This methodology has been used to successfully develop and scale-out multiple processes to CDC lines.”   Coating covered Not only does GEA have what Jim calls “grouped unit operations” for applications such as wet granulation —wherein a twin-screw granulator is combined with a single cell fluid bed — standalone systems such as dosing and blending rigs, an independent feeder and/or continuous coaters are also available. In addition, plant for direct compression can also be supplied. The ConsiGma® DC-LB Lines integrate continuous dry blending using linear blenders and tablet compression into one efficient continuous production system. Being able to accommodate differently sized blenders makes it a fully configurable setup. From an operational perspective, adds Jim, the advantage of the GEA Coater during R&D is that you don’t have to run a full-scale trial with all the associated losses of startup, shutdown, etc. All you need is a 1.5 kg plug and then, to scale-out your production, you just repeat the process. It's the same with wet granulation. Doing so gives you the certainty that you can basically repeat the same operation — or just run it for longer — to achieve commercial levels of production. Jim suggests that a well-known top-tier pharmaceutical company has recently invested in two ConsiGma®-1 units and coaters and is in the process of replacing their existing batch coating equipment with GEA machinery. “It’s now their default choice of coating technology for R&D,” he says. “With the three sizes of coating pans we offer, you have the option of using 1.5, 3.0 or 6.0 kg samples simply scaling that out.”   In conclusion Shining the spotlight on wet granulation as an example application, many of the most well-known names in the pharmaceutical sector have products on the market that were initially tested on a ConsiGma®-1 unit, subsequently transferred to a larger development and launch rig (DLR) and were then put into commercial production. Reaping the benefits of grouped unit operations during R&D enables GEA customers to expedite product development, eliminate scale-up and rapidly transfer the manufacturing process to an integrated line. Plus, by producing tablets continuously, “batch sizes” are simply determined by how long you run the machine.  It’s also helping the pharmaceutical industry to produce higher quality products, enhance drug safety, reduce its industrial footprint and decrease waste, which provides significant advantages to governments, companies and patients alike. Continuous processing is the future of pharmaceutical manufacturing. As Jim will attest, the majority of the top ten pharmaceutical companies have now confirmed that their strategy is to develop both new chemical entities (NCEs) and, when economically and technically viable, also manufacture legacy ethical and generic products using continuous technologies.   Read the full article on ManufacturingChemist.com  

Article

Optimising early-stage drug development with continuous processing

Apr 30, 2025