Press Room

Article / Nov 27, 2020

Europe’s drug supply chain gets ready for a makeover

C&EN, 20 May 2019

As the European Commission prepares a new pharmaceutical strategy, manufacturers seek financial support and technology investment

by Rick Mullin

NOVEMBER 27, 2020 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 98, ISSUE 46

 

When the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in the pharmaceutical supply chain in the US—in particular its dependence on products outsourced to Asia—the government responded forcefully. The Trump administration led with an initial grant of $354 million, with a possible $458 million to follow, for a newly formed company, Phlow, dedicated to manufacturing critical active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) domestically.

Next came a letter of intent for a $765 million loan to Eastman Kodak to convert a specialty chemical plant at the company’s headquarters in Rochester, New York, into an API manufacturing complex dedicated to “reshoring” pharmaceutical chemicals from China and India.

Now it’s Europe’s turn. The European Commission (EC) has been studying the global supply chain, setting itself a year-end deadline for delivering a drug and health-care strategy. Proposed road maps solicited by the EC from manufacturers of APIs and finished drugs illustrate differences between the US approach and Europe’s possible path to self-sufficiency in pharmaceutical manufacturing.

In a meeting in April with the European Union conference of presidents, the EU’s health and food safety commissioner, Stella Kyriakides, raised the matter of supply chain vulnerabilities exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Kyriakides cited “structural weaknesses in the EU’s medicines supply chain and a high dependence on non-EU countries for active pharmaceutical ingredients” and recommended that supply chain issues be addressed in an EU strategy. The EC solicited public comment on the proposed strategy in June.

Judging from the recommendations put forward by European associations representing drug and pharmaceutical chemical firms, the commission’s approach will differ significantly from the tack taken by the outgoing Trump administration. Rather than spending millions of euros launching made-in-Europe ventures, the EC will likely leverage a sizable established manufacturing base. Likewise, industry guidance for Europe’s plan places greater emphasis on making its supply chain more secure rather than less global, while maintaining and expanding the region’s manufacturing footprint.

Adrian van den Hoven, general director of Medicines for Europe, an association of generic-drug and API makers, stresses that reshoring cannot be viewed as simply resuming the manufacture of products that have been outsourced to China and India. “It’s a question of making it sustainable to invest and continue to invest in Europe,” van den Hoven says. “We still have a pretty robust industrial footprint in Europe, with a lot of capabilities.” But growth has flattened in recent years, he adds, as manufacturers in countries like India have taken market share.

 

Pharmaceutical Supply Chain API Manufacturing Management team | Hovione
Luis Gomes, second from left, with his production management team, advocates selective reshoring and investment in technology.

 

Medicines for Europe’s proposals to the EC include a change to generic-drug pricing, which individual countries currently set at the lowest possible levels to reduce the cost of subsidized health care. The association proposes a scheme that would allow prices to be negotiated from the bottom up based on a supplier’s cost of goods, regulatory costs, and other considerations.

For hospital and retail purchases, van der Hoven says Medicines for Europe favors “multi-winner tenders,” in which buyers are required to purchase from several suppliers as opposed to awarding contracts to the lowest bidder, a practice that has fueled consolidation among drug suppliers.

The group also advocates government support for technology development. Van den Hoven points to Europe’s almost $900 billion COVID-19 recovery package, “The commission has made it clear that some of the funding will be available for technology investment by our sector,” he says.

Medicines for Europe also advocates global coordination of drug supply as opposed to rampant reshoring. “It is important that we maintain critical technologies in Europe,” van den Hoven says. “That said, we don’t believe we can or should produce everything in Europe.”

That view is seconded by Luis Gomes, senior vice president of operations at the Portuguese API firm Hovione. He’s also chairman of the Pharmaceutical Activities Committee of the European Fine Chemicals Group (EFCG), an industry association.

“I think the commission has an understanding that it needs to strengthen the production of pharma products in Europe in order to reduce the dependence and vulnerability of the supply chain,” Gomes says. “I think regulators need a kind of road map to pursue what I would call meaningful pharmaceutical production reshoring in Europe. That starts with priorities.”

The EC must arrive at a list of critical APIs that need to be manufactured in Europe, Gomes says. Those no longer made in Europe can be reintroduced, thus increasing the domestic manufacturing base. “And it’s not only APIs one cares about,” he says. “You are also dependent on supply of intermediates and building blocks. You need to look at the supply chain from an end-to-end perspective.”

Pharmaceutical chemistry presents a significant hurdle given that many of the reactions involved have disappeared from Europe in the wake of the region’s Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) legislation and other environmental tightening over the past 2 decades. For example, REACH required expensive environmental controls on reactions such as nitration, fluorination, and bromination, which are critical to making certain drug ingredients. “I think REACH created an incentive for production of these chemicals to move to other places, especially Asia, but that doesn’t mean they cannot be manufactured again in Europe,” Gomes says.

Like Medicines for Europe, EFCG sees a need for the government to invest in green technology. Financial support will also be needed to establish European production of critical drugs and drug ingredients now made exclusively overseas.

Maggie Saykali, director of resins and fine chemicals at the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic), says in an email that her trade association also has been in discussions with the EC regarding vulnerabilities in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Cefic is preparing a report with recommendations at the commission’s request.

“One of the pillars of our roadmap is selective reshoring of the critical technologies needed for the molecules for which long-term supplies must be guaranteed,” Saykali writes. “In order to be sustainable in the long run, this selective reshoring needs support for process innovation, expansion of existing EU production facilities and enforcement of a level playing field for the highest-quality safety, environmental, and social standards.”

Sources agree that continuous manufacturing technology will play a role in developing efficient and green manufacturing. They also agree that the Research Center of Pharmaceutical Engineering’s Center for Continuous Flow Synthesis and Processing (CC Flow) initiative at Graz University is the center of continuous technology development in Europe.

C. Oliver Kappe, scientific director of CC Flow, says that his lab is not communicating directly with the EC on the development of a reshoring strategy but that several of its partners are contract manufacturers and members of associations such as EFCG. Kappe says the lab plans to set up a facility near Graz, Austria, that will pilot the manufacture of both APIs and finished drugs in a fully continuous fashion.

Continuous manufacturing could help avert crises such as drug shortages during pandemics in Europe, Kappe argues. He notes that CC Flow has worked on a process for manufacturing remdesivir, a COVID-19 treatment developed by Gilead Sciences. It also has collaborated with a similar center in the US, the Medicines for All Institute at Virginia Commonwealth University. Medicines for All is a partner in Phlow, the company launched by the Trump administration to repatriate generic drugs.

While Europe has taken a few pages from the US response to the COVID-19 pandemic—the EU recently announced it would create a biomedical research agency comparable to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, the US government agency that launched Phlow—the European path will inevitably differ. Observers note that Brussels is coordinating 27 independent countries’ efforts, ensuring a more protracted process than experienced in Washington.

One EU country has floated a Phlow-like venture with a view toward securing domestic supply of acetaminophen. The government of France is sponsoring a partnership with the French drug firms Sanofi and Upsa and the French API maker Seqens to establish domestic supply of the analgesic, which currently comes mostly from China. Seqens manufactures bulk acetaminophen there. Upsa and Sanofi manufacture most of the finished drug used in France, but they source API from China. The plan, still at a preliminary stage, would have Seqens add capacity for the API in France.

Van den Hoven at Medicines for Europe likes the hospital and health-care-facility purchasing strategy adopted by Phlow and its partner Civica Rx, a nonprofit launched in 2018 to help manage generic-drug prices and prevent shortages for member institutions. But he questions the US government’s decision to spend up to $800 million establishing a new company to foster domestic manufacturing of APIs.

“It’s an incredible amount of money,” he says. “In Europe, we can do it for a lot less.” He points to Sandoz’s deal with the Austrian government to invest more than $175 million at its site in Kundl, Austria, Europe’s last large antibiotics plant. “This is really small change for a production site that supplies half of Europe with penicillin,” van den Hoven says.

On Nov. 25 the EC issued its Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe, which outlines a raft of initiatives the commission will put forward for approval by the European governing bodies. The strategy, which is not finalized, addresses many of the manufacturing issues raised by industry associations, including pricing policies and investment in green technology. But it lacks details on regulatory changes impacting the use of continuous process manufacturing, and it does not suggest the creation of a list of critical APIs. Van den Hoven says the commission is still fielding input from industry pending a finalized plan.

Europe’s drug manufacturers are awaiting further direction from the EC just as the world braces for a surge in COVID-19 infections that may reignite supply chain anxiety. Van den Hoven notes, however, that the first wave of the pandemic was marked by a cooperative response globally. For instance, Europe expedited the export of drugs used in intensive care units to the US despite crisis-level demand for the same drugs at home, he says.

“The political climate is a little tense right now,” van den Hoven says. “But at some point people are going to have to go back to cooperation again.”

 

Read the full article on C&EN website

 

Also in the Press Room

See All

The global inhalation contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) market is projected to grow from USD 9.13 billion in 2025 to USD 16.68 billion by 2035, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.7% during the forecast period. This growth is driven by the increasing prevalence of respiratory diseases, advancements in inhalation drug delivery technologies, and the rising demand for outsourced manufacturing services in the pharmaceutical industry. The inhalation CDMO market has emerged as a pivotal segment in the pharmaceutical contract development and manufacturing industry. With a rising demand for inhaled therapies for conditions like asthma, COPD, and cystic fibrosis, companies are increasingly outsourcing drug development and production to specialized partners. Inhalation CDMO services cater to both large pharmaceutical corporations and small biotech firms, offering expertise in formulation, device compatibility, regulatory support, and scale-up manufacturing. This market is gaining traction due to the complexity of inhalation drug delivery, which often requires niche technical capabilities and specialized equipment. Outsourcing to an inhalation CDMO allows drug developers to reduce time-to-market while ensuring quality and compliance with global standards. (...) Top Companies Several players dominate the inhalation CDMO market through technological expertise, global reach, and service portfolio diversity: (...) Hovione – Offers particle engineering and inhalation development, with a focus on dry powder inhalers. (...) These companies are continually investing in facilities, talent, and technology to meet evolving customer needs in the inhalation CDMO market.   Read the full article on Pharmiweb.com        

Press Clipping

Inhalation CDMO Market Growth Analysis & Forecast 2025 to 2035

Jun 25, 2025

Pharmaceutical innovators face many challenges when developing new products; as such, getting them to market in a timely, safe and cost-effective way is critical. The use of continuous manufacturing technologies can help to overcome some of the most pressing early-stage obstacles Improving production methods for generic drugs or extending the lifecycle of existing oral solid dosage (OSD) forms is an integral part of the day-to-day operations of many global pharmaceutical companies. At the same time, when formulating new molecular entities, issues such as reducing the cost-per-tablet, increasing patient safety and optimising the price/performance balance of a new drug are common daily concerns. During the early stages of research and development (R&D), however, the availability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is limited. As such, there is an absolute requirement for process equipment that can produce just a few hundred grams of finished product to fast-track novel formulations.  The changing perspectives of regulatory bodies such as the US FDA and EMA now mean that there’s a better way to improve both supply chain efficiency and product throughput. It’s the 21st century, the pharmaceutical industry is less risk-averse these days, and it’s well-known that continuous manufacturing (CM) solutions can accelerate product development, reduce costs, improve operational economics and make production more agile. CM can accelerate the development of innovative products and increase the quality assurance of existing ones by driving process excellence. It’s a more efficient and flexible technology, offering more consistent and reliable tablet production with the reduced use (and loss) of resources such as precious APIs and raw materials. Additional benefits include less downtime and minimal manual intervention.   Introducing ConsiGma® The ConsiGma® portfolio from GEA Pharma & Healthcare is a multipurpose platform that has been designed to transfer powder into coated tablets in development, pilot, clinical and production volumes in a single compact unit. The system can perform the dosing and mixing of raw materials, wet or dry granulation, drying, tableting and quality control, all in one line. And, as it can produce granules continuously, there is no waste during start-up and shutdown and the batch size is determined simply by how long you run the machine. Quality is measured throughout the process and, as such, drastically reduces the cost-per-tablet. The ConsiGma® concept combines Quality by Design (QbD) principles with Design of Experiments (DoE) to explore and optimise a wide range of process parameters with less product in a shorter time frame.  Dr James (Jim) Holman, Senior Director of Technology Management, Pharma Solids, at GEA, takes up the story: “Our stance with CM is consistent in terms of how we approach both commercial-scale and early development work. We’ve created a range of unit operations or submodules, for example, that are ideal for process or product optimisation studies. For wet granulation, for instance, we have the ConsiGma®-1. You can use the same granulator that you would for a larger-scale machine but simply connect it to a single cell of a six-cell fluid bed system.” He adds: “Our approach to R&D is that we try to scale-out rather than scale-up. Our equipment is specifically designed so that you can process a plug or product key in a very controlled way to limit material usage.”  Jim can cite a litany of Big Pharma organisations that have “developed molecules on our systems in R&D, subsequently transferred them to production and have now had them approved for sale and use.” He acknowledges that, compared with a traditional production-scale system, there are advantages and disadvantages to consider. But he emphasises: “To support our thinking and what we’ve done, there are a lot of commercial products on the market that were made using GEA CM systems.”   The ConsiGma®-1: an integrated R&D solution Developed as a mobile, plug-and-play laboratory-scale version of the GEA’s continuous tableting platform, the ConsiGma®-1 can convert powders into dry granules and is ideal for small-scale research and development applications. It’s specifically designed for maximum flexibility and simplicity in early formulation development work. And, because of its rapid processing times and ability to run batches of a few hundred grams up to 5 kg or more, it’s ideal for developing formula and process parameters using DoE — which can then be scaled-out to the full-size ConsiGma® wet granulation system. “With ConsiGma®, we can help companies all over the world to maximise their R&D efforts and capitalise on the very worthwhile expenditure by getting first-rate products to market quicker,” notes Jim. When equipped with the optional fluid bed dryer segment, drying parameters for batch sizes of 500–1500 g can be determined on the ConsiGma®-1. And, because these granulation details can be directly scaled-out to a production model (such as the ConsiGma®-25), which benefits from the same design, there is no scale-up.  Furthermore, as the retention time of the product in the system is minimal, any change in these parameters is almost immediately visible. This allows for very fast and easy exploration of the design space. The result is a better understanding of both operational capabilities and critical process parameters (CPPs), which ultimately contribute to higher levels of quality assurance and patient safety.  The ConsiGma®-1 is designed for rapid deployment, will fit into the most compact of laboratories and can be transported easily to wherever it’s needed. Installation only requires electricity and standard utilities such as water and compressed air. The system is conceived to be a “plug-and-play” installation. To enhance the R&D flexibility even further, the ConsiGma®-1 can also be configured for hot melt granulation and/or upgraded for contained processing. To cite an example, a ConsiGma®-1 unit was recently used to expedite the development process for a new product during in-house trials. Everything was running smoothly during scale-out to a commercial-size line, until one of the raw material sources had to be changed. Anticipating granulation issues due to the changed specifications of the raw material, and with a pending deadline — and not wishing to revert to the ConsiGma®-1 for redevelopment (or to clean another piece of equipment) — it was decided to tackle the issue using the production-scale CM line. Owing to the inherent flexibility of continuous processing and the transferable compatibility of the critical parameters, the correct settings were found in just a few hours using only a limited amount of product. Full production mode could be quickly reinstated with minimal disruption. The ConsiGma® DC for continuous direct compression is the most recent expansion of GEA's portfolio of cost-effective, compact and high-yield manufacturing systems. By integrating four key technologies — accurate loss-in-weight feeding, continuous blending, tablet compression technology and the online measurement of CQAs (Critical Quality Attributes), it offers a robust and flexible production method for a wide range of products in a small footprint. Of note here is that standalone plant is often used to separately test and optimise the critical unit operations before the entire line is constructed, thereby accelerating the process. This means that each manufacturing step can be enhanced without first having to run or invest in a complete process chain. One company that has benefited from this approach is Hovione, a specialist contract development and manufacturing organisation. Using a combination of standalone laboratory scale units coupled with process analytical technology (PAT) tools, computational models and powder characterisation equipment, Hovione is developing processes at the R&D scale with minimal material consumption and resources. The standalone dosing and blending unit is equipped with feeders and blenders that are identical to those used in GEA’s GMP Continuous Direct Compression (CDC) lines. Powder characterisation and the use of compaction simulations “close the circle” in terms of connecting the unit operations and allow operators to fully define the process parameters that are used in a digital twin version of the line. João Henriques, R&D Director – Oral Drug Product Development comments: “This integrated platform accelerates process development, helps to optimise formulation and product parameters and improves operational performance. It also enables the seamless scale-out of continuous tableting processes to a GMP line with reduced risk and low API consumption. This methodology has been used to successfully develop and scale-out multiple processes to CDC lines.”   Coating covered Not only does GEA have what Jim calls “grouped unit operations” for applications such as wet granulation —wherein a twin-screw granulator is combined with a single cell fluid bed — standalone systems such as dosing and blending rigs, an independent feeder and/or continuous coaters are also available. In addition, plant for direct compression can also be supplied. The ConsiGma® DC-LB Lines integrate continuous dry blending using linear blenders and tablet compression into one efficient continuous production system. Being able to accommodate differently sized blenders makes it a fully configurable setup. From an operational perspective, adds Jim, the advantage of the GEA Coater during R&D is that you don’t have to run a full-scale trial with all the associated losses of startup, shutdown, etc. All you need is a 1.5 kg plug and then, to scale-out your production, you just repeat the process. It's the same with wet granulation. Doing so gives you the certainty that you can basically repeat the same operation — or just run it for longer — to achieve commercial levels of production. Jim suggests that a well-known top-tier pharmaceutical company has recently invested in two ConsiGma®-1 units and coaters and is in the process of replacing their existing batch coating equipment with GEA machinery. “It’s now their default choice of coating technology for R&D,” he says. “With the three sizes of coating pans we offer, you have the option of using 1.5, 3.0 or 6.0 kg samples simply scaling that out.”   In conclusion Shining the spotlight on wet granulation as an example application, many of the most well-known names in the pharmaceutical sector have products on the market that were initially tested on a ConsiGma®-1 unit, subsequently transferred to a larger development and launch rig (DLR) and were then put into commercial production. Reaping the benefits of grouped unit operations during R&D enables GEA customers to expedite product development, eliminate scale-up and rapidly transfer the manufacturing process to an integrated line. Plus, by producing tablets continuously, “batch sizes” are simply determined by how long you run the machine.  It’s also helping the pharmaceutical industry to produce higher quality products, enhance drug safety, reduce its industrial footprint and decrease waste, which provides significant advantages to governments, companies and patients alike. Continuous processing is the future of pharmaceutical manufacturing. As Jim will attest, the majority of the top ten pharmaceutical companies have now confirmed that their strategy is to develop both new chemical entities (NCEs) and, when economically and technically viable, also manufacture legacy ethical and generic products using continuous technologies.   Read the full article on ManufacturingChemist.com  

Article

Optimising early-stage drug development with continuous processing

Apr 30, 2025