Press Room

Press Release / Nov 03, 2010

Hovione Wins Flumethasone Patent Case

(Lisbon, Portugal and New York, NY)—Hovione and Dickstein Shapiro LLP are pleased to announce that the U.S. Patent and Trademark’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences has reconfirmed Hovione's patent claims to a method of making flumethasone and its 17-carboxyl androsten analogue, two key intermediates on the synthesis of fluticasone, an important corticosteroid used in asthma medications, reversing a rejection by the reexamination examiner. The inter parties reexamination appeal decision, which found in favor of each of the firm’s arguments, was issued on October 26, 2010.

“We are pleased that the board agreed with our demonstration that the method claimed in Hovione’s patent was not obvious, despite the attempt by a competitor to show otherwise,” said Edward Meilman, partner in Dickstein Shapiro’s Intellectual Property Practice. Mr. Meilman handled the reexamination proceeding on behalf of Portugal-based international pharmaceutical company, Hovione.

Reexamination is a procedure in which a patent is reconsidered in light of prior art not previously considered during the original patenting procedure. Competitors often use this procedure in an effort to eliminate the patent entirely or limit it to a procedure which can be avoided. U.S. Patent Office statistics indicate that about half of reexamined patents do not meet the statutory requirement that a patented invention be unobvious. The board here found that the determination that Hovione’s method was not obvious at the time the patent was first issued was not changed by new prior art.

A competitor filed for inter parties reexamination in April 2005 based on prior art which was not considered during the prosecution of the patent. The reexamination examiner used that new art to find the patent claims were obvious and should be cancelled. When the examiner could not be persuaded to change that viewpoint, Dickstein Shapiro appealed on behalf of Hovione. An oral argument, at which the competitor also presented arguments, was held in September 2010.

The patented method involves complex steroid chemistry—an area in which Hovione has led since the 1960s—and a primary issue on the appeal was whether a particular compound was inherently formed in the course of performing the same process as previously as the result of using a stereoisomer of the compound used by the art in one step. A stereoisomer is a compound which is identical to another compound except that one group in the molecule has a different orientation in space when the three dimensional configuration is considered. The examiner advanced several scientific reasons to show Hovione’s compound was inherently produced, and the firm countered with several scientific arguments that the examiner was wrong, including statements made by the competitor in its own patent which it had not brought to the attention of the U.S. Patent Office.

The appeals board accepted all of the firm’s arguments, found that inherency had not been established, and rejected the arguments advanced by the examiner and the competitor.

Guy Villax, Hovione Chief Executive, commented as follows, “This outcome is a victory. One of the authors of this patent was Ivan Villax, my father and founder of Hovione—so we’d fight this one in any case. Fluticasone is a product where we believe we will continue to have a central role going forward. Our company believes in picking winners and not letting go.”

Dickstein Shapiro’s nationally ranked Intellectual Property Practice has more than 80 attorneys who work with clients to develop strategies that capitalize on their intellectual property assets and achieve their business objectives. The firm is ranked by Chambers USA, Managing Intellectual Property and Intellectual Property Today magazines as a top firm for intellectual property work. Dickstein Shapiro has the experience, skill, and knowledge to successfully solve intellectual property problems for clients striving to succeed in this ever-changing, highly competitive arena.

About Dickstein Shapiro LLP 

Dickstein Shapiro LLP, founded in 1953, is internationally recognized for its work with clients, from start-ups to Fortune 500 corporations. Dickstein Shapiro provides strategic counsel and develops multidisciplinary legal solutions by leveraging its core strengths—litigation, regulatory, transactions, and advocacy—to successfully advance clients’ business interests.

About Hovione 

Hovione is an international company with 51 years’ experience in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient development and compliant manufacture. With four FDA inspected sites in the U.S., China, Ireland, and Portugal, the company focuses on the most demanding customers, in the most regulated markets. The company also offers integrated API, particle design and formulation development and manufacturing. In the inhalation area, Hovione is the only independent company offering such a broad range of services. 
For more information about Hovione, please visit the Hovione site at www.hovione.com  or contact Corporate Communications, Isabel Pina, + 351 21 982 9362, e-mail: ipina@hovione.com.

 

 

 

Also in the Press Room

See All

Continuous Tableting (CT) is defined as continuous manufacturing of oral dose drugs, specifically tablets. As per ICH's Q13 definition1, a continuous manufacturing process in the pharmaceutical industry comprises at least two unit operations integrated from a mechanical and software perspective. There is a wide combination of possible CT process configurations that are dependent on the needs of the intended product formulation and each of the individual unit operations that constitute the process train can be continuous, semi-continuous, or batch processes. The typical manufacturing processes for tablet formulation are direct compression (DC), dry granulation (DG) and wet granulation (WG)2 - details on these manufacturing processes are beyond the scope of this article, so the interested reader is directed to relevant literature. The actual implementation of CT technology in a facility can broadly vary depending on the level of desired integration and automation. Process trains can be designed to be flexible and converted between multiple configurations (e.g. continuous DC, DG and WG), controlled by the end user from one single software and within a single clean room. The other possibility would be for subsections of the CT process to be divided into multiple clean rooms where inprocess materials are transferred between suites via a bin-to-bin approach (e.g. a granulation suite to prepare granules from raw materials followed by continuous DC (CDC) to blend the granules and produce tablets). The level of automation and instrumentation designed into the CT process (typically involving Process Analytical Technologies, PAT) can open the possibility to implement sophisticated control strategies. Key components of a control strategy that need to be considered for CT are material tracking and genealogy, knowledge of the residence time distribution (RTD), and in-process controls (spectroscopic and/or soft sensors based on process parameters). Holistically, these control strategy elements enable the implementation of a material diversion strategy to automatically divert out of specification material from the process. In their most advanced form, control strategies may also enable real time release testing (RTRt) of the final tablet drug product and reduce the off-line analytical burden and the number of operators needed to manage the process.   Read the full article at gmp-journal.com  

Article

Continuous Tableting and the Road to Global Adoption

Mar 04, 2024